Trading Rules
We check whether prohibited strategies, consistency rules, drawdown calculations, and account restrictions are written clearly enough to be applied consistently.
Independent funded trading oversight
Network for Funded Accountability (NFA) reviews how funded trading firms write their rules, handle payouts, close accounts, and respond when a trader disputes a decision.
Our scope is deliberately narrow. We do not rate investment performance, recommend trading firms, or provide brokerage services.
Firms may voluntarily submit to review and ongoing reporting under the NFA Accountability Standards.
We check whether prohibited strategies, consistency rules, drawdown calculations, and account restrictions are written clearly enough to be applied consistently.
We review payout timelines, rejection reasons, documentation requirements, and whether firms follow the payout terms that were in force when a trader qualified.
When a funded account is terminated, we look for a specific rule, the relevant trading activity, and a documented decision process rather than a generic violation notice.
NFA requests the firm’s written decision, the rule in effect at the time, and the records used to support that decision. Reviews are limited to whether the firm followed its published rules and documented procedures.
Independent record-based reviewA firm may not apply a newly introduced trading restriction to activity that took place before the rule was published.
Firms must publish the normal review period for payout requests and identify any additional review before the deadline expires.
A termination notice must identify the rule relied upon and the account activity that caused the decision.
A simulated funded account may not be presented to customers as a live brokerage account or as direct access to firm capital.
The firm identifies its legal entity, operating jurisdictions, customer-facing brands, and current trading programs.
NFA staff review current terms, payout rules, account closure procedures, and material customer disclosures.
A sample of recent payout and account decisions is checked against the firm’s published rules.
Approved firms receive a registry record showing scope, review date, status, and any active conditions.
The complaint must identify the account, payout request, and the rule or reason given by the firm.
NFA checks whether the cited rule existed at the time and whether the firm can document the activity behind its decision.
NFA does not determine whether a trading program is profitable or whether a trader should have purchased an evaluation.
NFA Regulator exists because funded trading programs sit in an unusual part of the market: customers pay for access to trading evaluations and simulated or funded accounts, while the most important commercial decisions are often made under firm-specific rules.